WecanusuallylearnmuchmorefrompeoplewhosharesimilarviewswithusthanfromthosewhoseviewscontradicttooursDisagreementcancausestressandpreventusfromlearning. 　　Usually,weperfertoaccepttheviewthataresimilartooursandthiscouldencourageuslearningmorethings.Incontrast,ifpeople'sviewscontradicttoourown,wecaneasilybestressedoutandthereforelosethecouragetolearnfrompeople.Itisunderstandablethatwehavetheseperspectives,sinceinpeople'smind,wearealwayswillingtoaccepttheviewthatsupportours.Thisisnormal.Butisitreallyso?Letusdosomeanalysis. 　　Theremusthavepositiveandnegativeopinionswhenweargueanissue.Andasmankindalwaysis,itiseasierforustoacceptthepositiveones.Everyonehopestogetothersagreedon.Beingrecognizedbyotherscanbringushonors,confidence,andenthusiasm.Thepositiveopinionscouldraiseourenthusiasm.However,whatifouropinonisnotfullycorrect?Asamatteroffactwealwaysmakemistakes.Butifweonlyacceptpositiveoppinionsthatmatchwithourview,itwillcoverupourmistake.Thoughtheseopinionsinspireusandtriggerourenthusiasm,atthesametimetheyalsoblindusfromourweakness;andwecannotimproveanymore. 　　Bycontrast,thoseoppositeopinionsmaydiscourageusforshortterm.Butfromoverallperspective,theseoppositeopinionscouldexposeourshortage,andmakeusclearonhowwecanimproveourweakness,thushelpusonourimprovement.Forexample,duringadebate,twosidesbothtrytheirbesttofindopponent'smistakesbychallengingtheiropinions.Thoughthismethodlookslikegivinghardtimestooneanother,throughthisdog-fightlikepractice,wecandevelopdeepcontentinthetopic. 　　Moreover,oppositeopinionsarethekeystoimproveoursociety.Everygreatevolutioninhumanhistorywerecompaniedbyoppositeopinions.Forexample,theinventionofcomputer,throughresearchtotechnology,atthattime,VonNeumannfirstproposedthecomputermodelbasedonbinarysystem.ThisisanewtheroyatthattimeTHistheroyconstructedfudementalofcomputerdesignatourage.Maybeinthefuture,therewillbeabettermodelthatoverturnsthecurrentbinarysystem.thusbuildamorepowerfulcomputer. 　　Last,oppositeopinionsaresourcepowerthatdirectthingsdevelopbetter.IthinkweshouldallknowabouttheproductofAppple.WhetherMacBook,iPhone,oriPad.Thefirstimpressiontheseproductgiveusisthatithasveryperfectappearance.Itissimplyanatrwork.Butbehindtheseperfections,therearedebates,oppositeoppinionsondesigneswhicheventuallyleadtoimprovement.Suchasthebuttonsinthedisplayofappleproduct,havetopassdiscussionsandreviseatleastdozensoftimes,Throughthesecontiuneousdisigning,denialandredisigningprocess,eventuallybringupthisperfectproduct. 　　Inconclusion,alhroughfrompersonalaspect,weperfertoacceptthosepositiveopinons,fromtheaspectofimprovingourselvesandsociey,theseoppositeopinionsaremorevaluable. 　　点评：文法,句法,标点,大小写,单词拼写,错误很多,会扣很多分.我都给你改好了.最严重的是,你用了doutful,来表达反对的意见(oppositeoppinions).doutful是怀疑的意思,用在这里让人很混淆.致命缺点,你的前两个例子不能够说明你的观点,比如电脑的革新,你完全没有提到在设计的时候反对意见对他先进的发展起到了什么作用.只是说以后会怎样,这个就没有力度了.苹果的例子举得还可以. 　　总的来说,框架是有了,但是整个文章缺乏润色.我也只能改改文法那些.祝你好运.