Yes. 　　"OnLiberty.Widelyheldasaseminaltextontherightsoftheindividual,uponcloserexaminationOnLibertyrevealsitselftobeaeuphemisticre-statingofMill'seconomicideasasappliedwithinthesocialrealm.Inshort,headvocatesaculturalclasssystemgovernedbyanintellectualelite."Individualism"is,itturnsout,aconceptthatcanonlybeutilizedbyalucky,talentedfew.AsMill'sdelineatesintheessay,"individualism"asanidealmustbesacrificedtoeconomicinterestsifthetwoconflict.Furthermore,individualexpressionisdeemedmoreimportantfor"theexceptional"ratherthanthe"commonplace"lowerclassesorcolonialpopulations.Thereforeindividualliberty,asMill'sdefinesit,canonlybeenjoyedbythosefovoredbymaterialstatus.Thustheindividualistconcept,sodeeplyintertwinedwiththecapitalistsystem,cannot,andindeedisnotmeantto,beuniversallyenjoyed;insteaditisenjoyedmostlybythesectorofthesocietyitbenefitsthemost,theowner/bourgeoisclass." 　　©1993ShirleyGalloway